Trump put: Has the market’s Trump bet been wiped out? Maybe – or maybe not
Perhaps the market response, or a belated understanding of the turmoil the tariffs would create for US companies and the inflationary impacts they would have on consumer prices, might have finally sunk in.
The tariffs would, for instance, go a long way towards destroying the US auto industry, which is highly integrated with Mexican and Canadian supply chains. There are some estimates that those ructions could add up to $US12,000 to the price of an SUV. Others say the average price of a car in America could rise by $US3000 or more.
Combine more fearful consumers with anxious corporates, reduced investment because of the increasing uncertainty and a sliding stockmarket, and there could be a material impact on economic growth.
They would also have a material impact on share prices, cutting corporate earnings, reducing price-earnings multiples and increasing the risk premiums for US stocks. Goldman Sachs has estimated that they could lead to a 5 per cent decline in the S&P500.
Consumers have also woken up to the threat of the tariffs, with consumer confidence falling and expectations of inflation (which tend to be reflected in consumers’ behaviours) rising.
Combine more fearful consumers with anxious corporates, reduced investment because of the increasing uncertainty and a sliding stockmarket, and there could be a material impact on economic growth.
Loading
Trump’s Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said the administration is targeting the 10-year bond rate, hoping to lower inflation and interest rates, along with the $US1 trillion-plus annual cost of servicing the government’s $US36.1 trillion pile of debt.
The bond rate is heading in the right direction for, from the administration’s viewpoint, the wrong reasons. The yield on 10-year bonds has fallen from 4.55 per cent two weeks ago to 4.22 per cent and the yield on 2-year notes is now below 4 per cent, a threshold last breached in October last year.
That’s because bond investors see an increased risk of an economic slowdown.
They’re worried about the potential for a recession caused by Trump’s trade policies and Elon Musk’s disruptive and potentially destructive assault on government agencies and their staff.
Trump’s tariffs, so far, have been imposed in response to the roles Trump claims China, Mexico and Canada play in the importation of fentanyl to the US – even though imports from Canada are minuscule. The targeted countries bought themselves a pause last month by promising to do more to fight fentanyl imports, and perhaps more promises will give Trump an excuse to back off again.
In circumstances where the actions of the US government are so erratic and unpredictable, the only safe place for investors is on the sidelines.
The reciprocal tariffs that he has said are coming next month, along with sector-specific tariffs like those he has announced on steel and aluminium imports (autos, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and timber are on the list) are far more directly related to trade and America’s trade deficit, and will apply far more broadly than those imposed or announced so far.
Imports from any country will trigger a review of its tariff, tax and trade practices – including things like Europe’s digital services taxes or Australia’s local content requirements – and potentially lead to new tariffs. Trump has already said he will slap tariffs on the European Union, which has pledged to retaliate.
The US deficit, of course, has little to do with America’s trade partners somehow taking unfair advantage of it, but is a result of macro factors. Essentially, America consumes, invests and borrows more than it saves.
That hasn’t, however, stopped its economy from significantly outperforming almost all the countries with which it has a trade deficit. So it could be argued that access to cheap imports of goods the US either doesn’t manufacture, or where it isn’t a sufficiently competitive manufacturer, has been good for the US economy.
Indeed, the increasing post-war globalisation of trade has (had?) increased US economic influence within the global economy and financial system and driven the pre-eminence of the US dollar — with all the geopolitical authority that has provided to the US — not diminished it.
Most modelling of the impact of the tariffs already announced or imposed show that, while the damage on the exporting economies would be greater, the US would still suffer materially, with lower growth and higher inflation.
That’s why sharemarket investors, exposed to a market that has massively outperformed other markets thanks to the performance of the big tech stocks, have been nervous about the prospect of another Trump trade war. They know it would hurt US and global growth.
They also know that uncertainty equals risk, and that the fate of their economy and their wealth is now dependent on the daily whims of Trump. He might, given his comments on trade and other economic issues, be economically illiterate, but he now completely dominates US policymaking.
With the uncertainties proliferating, the risks now increasingly real and rising and investors unsure whether the “Trump Put” still exists or was just a delusion, financial markets are likely to become increasingly volatile.
Are the tariffs announced on Tuesday still going to be in place on Friday? In circumstances where the actions of the US government are so erratic and unpredictable, the only safe place for investors is on the sidelines until an extremely fluid and risky policy environment becomes more settled.
The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.
